Understandably, many contractors can be frustrated by the Request for Proposal (RFP) process to bid on U.S. government contracts. It’s not surprising since government RFPs are often complicated and difficult to read. Here’s an example: “Section 1.2.3.4: The proponent must demonstrate how … with reference to the issues provided in addendum C … in detail in section 1.3 and 1.4 in this document, provided that 75% of the design of your solution has already been complete prior to … Any omissions to this response will result in non-compliance.” After reading language like this in government contracts, some qualified and successful contractors will simply abandon any thought of even trying to find government contracts, let alone aggressively pursuing or bidding on them.
The traditional RFP process represents a challenging approach to new business development. By its nature, it is a complicated method that makes winning government contracts very time-consuming. In fact, companies that bid on government contracts, RFPs and other bid opportunities are often going about it in a costly and inefficient way. Much of that effort can be avoided by engaging in a targeted approach for finding government contracts that considers:
The result is more work that fits the company’s expertise and growth plans. Knowledge of the owner/agency, combined with knowledge of the competition can produce the best strategy for bidding on government contracts. It’s not rocket science. This approach simply brings in more quality projects, using less labor and other company resources. In the long term, the cost of acquiring new business goes down, and profit is likely to increase.
The first step in the business development process after finding government projects to consider is to gather background on the owner/agency itself. Before contractors pursue a bid or RFP, they need to find out as much as possible about the owner of the government contract. To assist with the finding and gathering of owner/agency intelligence, ask and answer the following questions:
The answers to these questions provide insight into how to approach government business, or contractors may find that specific U.S. government contracts with this agency are simply not worth pursuing.
If the contractor decides to continue on, the second area of essential information is background on the government agency’s previous government contractors. Find out what the common denominator is. Determine how your company’s strengths align with those of the competition. And most importantly, know what the competition is offering in their bid. Specifically consider the following:
Through this government contract information gathering process, you will have a good profile of the type of contractor that is likely to obtain this work. But it won’t show whether your company has the wherewithal to obtain this government contract. That’s the next step.
Knowing your company’s strengths and having a portfolio of reference are key components in the development of a government bid strategy. The business must be right for your company, based on your background and expertise.
If there is a substantial portion of the U.S. government contract that depends on other skills (such as those of a landscape architecture firm) partnering or subcontracting should also be part of the bid strategy for the government contract. Questions to consider include:
By following this information gathering process when pursuing government contracts, you will have more key intelligence to make a more strategic response to government bids and RFPs. An easy way to make this long information gathering process quick and easy is to access Onvia’s government business intelligence database. If you’d like me to walk you through a personal demo, send me an email to AskIrv@onvia.com.